In a shocking turn of events, four college students from Assumption University in Massachusetts, who staged an amateur “Catch a Predator” sting operation, are now seeking to have criminal charges against them dismissed. The students, aged between 18 and 19, are facing serious allegations, including kidnapping, conspiracy, and assault related to a bizarre incident that left a 22-year-old active-duty military member assaulted and chased by a mob on campus.

The incident, which occurred on October 1, 2022, involved the students allegedly luring the victim to the university under the pretense of confronting him about supposed predatory behavior. According to reports, the victim had been communicating with one of the accused, Kelsey Brainard, on Tinder, where her profile had indicated she was 18 years old. However, the students claimed he was trying to engage with a minor, leading to a mob of approximately 25 individuals surrounding the victim, ultimately resulting in an attack where he was physically assaulted.

The students argue that the charges against them should be dropped on the grounds of insufficient evidence. In a motion filed in court, they contend that the alleged kidnapping did not occur, as the victim was never physically restrained, and therefore the essential elements of the charge were not met. Their defense also criticizes the prosecution’s narrative, suggesting that it unfairly portrays the events that transpired.

Defense attorney William Corman emphasized the complexity of the case, pointing out that while the students made poor decisions, their actions did not rise to the level of kidnapping or conspiracy. In Massachusetts, kidnapping requires some form of confinement or imprisonment, which, according to Corman, may not be substantiated by the evidence presented.

The prosecution maintains that there is enough evidence, including video footage from the incident, to support the charges. They argue that the group’s actions were premeditated and intended to confine the victim, thus fulfilling the legal criteria for kidnapping. However, the judge overseeing the case, Michael Allard Mattis, has reserved his decision on the motions to dismiss, indicating he will take time to review the evidence thoroughly.

The case has drawn attention not only due to the serious nature of the charges but also because it highlights the growing trend of amateur vigilante justice being seen on social media. This incident serves as a cautionary tale regarding the potential dangers and legal ramifications of such actions. As the legal proceedings continue, the implications for the students involved could be significant, not only in terms of their futures but also in addressing the broader issues of online vigilantism.

Assumption University has publicly condemned the conduct of the students, stating it is “abhorrent” and contrary to the institution’s values. The university has expressed its commitment to fostering a safe and respectful environment for all individuals on campus.

The next court date is scheduled for May 19, where the judge will further evaluate the motions and evidence presented. As this case unfolds, it raises critical questions about the boundaries of citizen involvement in law enforcement and the consequences that can arise from taking justice into one’s own hands.