In a shocking revelation, President Biden has disclosed that he orally authorized all pardons and commutations issued at the end of his term, a process he claims was executed via autopen due to the sheer volume of cases. This startling admission raises serious questions about the integrity and authenticity of the clemency process, as Biden himself did not personally sign the official warrants, igniting a political firestorm.

During a recent interview with The New York Times, Biden asserted that he made decisions on each clemency case, despite mounting evidence suggesting limited access to him during critical decision-making periods. Critics are already pointing to inconsistencies in his narrative, arguing that the logistics of processing numerous pardons in such a short timeframe strain credulity. Lawmakers on Capitol Hill are now poised to investigate further, as aides are set to testify about the decision-making process behind these controversial pardons.

The implications of this revelation are profound, as it raises the specter of accountability and transparency within the Biden administration. Observers are questioning the authenticity of Biden’s claims, with some suggesting that his carefully crafted statements resemble tactics used by previous administrations to evade scrutiny. The urgency of this situation cannot be overstated as it unfolds against the backdrop of ongoing congressional inquiries into the administration’s practices.

As the political landscape shifts, Biden’s admission could have lasting ramifications, not only for his presidency but also for the broader discourse surrounding executive power and clemency. With investigations looming and public trust at stake, the pressure is mounting for the administration to clarify its stance and provide concrete evidence supporting Biden’s assertions. This breaking news story is developing rapidly, and the nation is watching closely as the fallout continues.