What could put Biden’s pardons and EOs in ‘deep legal jeopardy’

Thumbnail

In a shocking turn of events, former White House Chief of Staff Jeff Zients has raised serious questions about President Joe Biden’s mental fitness and the legitimacy of his pardons and executive orders. During a gripping testimony before the House Oversight Committee, Zients revealed alarming details about Biden’s cognitive decline, stating that decision-making slowed drastically as his term progressed, sometimes requiring multiple meetings to finalize even simple decisions.

The committee is currently investigating online platforms like Reddit, Discord, Twitch, and Steam, which may have played a role in recent high-profile crimes, including the assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk. Zients’ testimony has added fuel to the fire, as he admitted that Hunter Biden was involved in discussions surrounding many of the controversial pardons, contradicting Biden’s claims that he delegated this responsibility to his staff.

Chairman James Comer emphasized the potential legal jeopardy surrounding Biden’s pardons, highlighting the excessive use of an auto-pen for signing documents—an action that raises significant concerns about the authenticity of those pardons and executive orders. This revelation could have far-reaching implications as the committee prepares to issue a report that may lead to legal challenges.

The urgency of this investigation cannot be overstated. With mounting evidence suggesting a pattern of misconduct, the committee is poised to delve deeper into the Biden administration’s actions. As the nation watches closely, the ramifications of these findings could shake the foundations of Biden’s presidency and expose critical vulnerabilities in his administration’s integrity. The Biden family may soon find themselves in the crosshairs of this escalating inquiry, as lawmakers seek to uncover the truth behind the decisions made in the highest office. The clock is ticking, and the stakes have never been higher.