In a recent episode of the popular podcast “Three Idiots,” co-host Demaris faced backlash for her outspoken disdain towards rapper Kendrick Lamar following the announcement of the Grammy nominations. The discussion, which has since sparked widespread debate online, highlighted the ongoing tensions between fans of different hip-hop artists, particularly Kendrick Lamar and Drake.
Demaris, who has been accused of harboring anti-Kendrick sentiments, expressed her frustration over the possibility of Lamar sweeping the Grammy awards, stating it would “piss her off.” This statement gained traction when she took to Twitter to reiterate her views, only to delete the post shortly after. The nominations for Best Rap Album at the 2026 Grammys feature Kendrick’s album “GNX,” alongside works from the likes of Glorilla and The Clips, igniting further scrutiny of her comments.
Critics, including podcast co-hosts Maul and Rory, have also been put under the microscope for their previous stances on Lamar. Maul has been known as a staunch defender of Drake, while Rory has faced accusations of being a closeted critic of Lamar, particularly following his controversial commentary surrounding the Drake versus UMG legal dispute. This dynamic within the podcast has led listeners to question the authenticity of their commentary, especially regarding their feelings about Kendrick’s success.
The discourse heated up as social media users unearthed past comments from Demaris where she explicitly stated her dislike for Kendrick’s voice and music. The resurfacing of this footage only intensified the scrutiny of her stance, as fans accused her of hypocrisy. Critics argue that her criticism of Kendrick is rooted less in a fair evaluation of his artistry and more in personal bias and jealousy.
Producers and figures within Kendrick’s camp, such as Punch from TDE and producer Terrace Martin, have noted the peculiar intensity of the backlash directed at Lamar, especially from those who previously claimed not to care about the Grammys. The contradiction in attitudes towards the awards ceremony has been a focal point in the ongoing debate, with many questioning the sincerity of those who express disdain for the Grammys yet show visible frustration at the thought of Kendrick winning.
As the podcast episode gained traction, Demaris attempted to mitigate the backlash by showcasing her recent listening habits on Apple Music, which included The Clips’ songs. However, listeners were quick to point out that this move seemed performative, questioning the authenticity of her claims. The situation has led to wider reflections on the nature of critique in hip-hop, with many arguing that the criticism often stems from a place of entitlement rather than substantive artistic evaluation.
The ongoing feud has underscored the complexities of fandom within hip-hop culture, where personal biases can lead to broader narratives that impact public perception. While differing musical tastes are natural, the manner in which critics express their opinions can often lead to accusations of hypocrisy and insincerity.
As the Grammy awards approach, the debate surrounding Kendrick Lamar, The Clips, and the internet’s reaction to their respective nominations continues to unfold, revealing deep-seated tensions within the hip-hop community. In a landscape where narratives can shift rapidly, the exposure of contradictions and performative critiques may play a significant role in shaping the discourse around this year’s awards. The internet, as always, remains a relentless archivist of opinions, ensuring that past statements come back to haunt those who attempt to rewrite history.
