In a shocking and bizarre twist on philanthropy, comedian Ronny Chieng has taken to the streets to promote the controversial “Shrimp Welfare Project,” a charity that aims to improve the lives of shrimp by reducing their suffering during slaughter. This eyebrow-raising initiative has sparked fierce debate about the ethics of effective altruism, as Chieng investigates the limits of charitable giving in a segment on “The Daily Show.”

In a world where traditional charities focus on human suffering, Chieng’s exploration of the plight of these crustaceans is raising eyebrows and questions. Andrés Giménez Zorrilla, a former finance professional turned shrimp advocate, reveals that his organization is dedicated to ensuring a more humane death for shrimp. “We make sure they have a more humane slaughter method,” he explains, highlighting practices like electrical stunning to reduce pain. However, critics are left wondering: is this really where our charitable dollars should go?

Chieng, with his signature wit, challenges the rationale behind prioritizing shrimp welfare over pressing human issues. “With a single dollar, we can improve the lives of over 2,000 shrimp. And zero humans,” he quips, questioning the strange math of effective altruism. As he engages with passersby, the absurdity of the situation becomes clear: while millions of shrimp suffer in silence, many people are oblivious—or worse, indifferent.

The segment culminates in a poignant moment as Chieng reflects on the implications of his newfound commitment to shrimp welfare. “Maybe they do deserve peace and happiness on the way to becoming my scampi,” he muses, sparking a complex conversation about the value of all life. As the world grapples with pressing issues, this peculiar charity raises an urgent question: where do we draw the line in our quest to do good?