A tragic case out of Durango, Mexico, has drawn international attention following the death of a 14-year-old girl, Paloma Nicole Ariano Escobedo, just days after undergoing cosmetic surgery allegedly performed by her stepfather. The shocking circumstances surrounding her death have prompted her biological father, Carlos Ariano, to demand a thorough investigation into both the medical procedures and the actions of her mother, Paloma Jasmine.
On September 20, Carlos received the heart-wrenching news of his daughter’s passing. Just a week prior, on September 12, he had been informed that Paloma was on a trip to the mountains with her mother. However, he was later alerted that she had been hospitalized due to a COVID-19 diagnosis, although the specifics of her treatment remain unclear. Family members rushed to the hospital to find Paloma intubated and in an induced coma. She ultimately succumbed to her condition on September 20.
In the immediate aftermath of her death, Carlos was not permitted to participate in funeral arrangements, which were handled solely by Paloma Jasmine and her partner. Alarm bells began to ring for Carlos when he noticed unusual scars on his daughter’s body during her funeral, leading him to suspect that she had undergone surgery without his consent. Subsequent investigations revealed that, in addition to breast implants, Paloma had also allegedly undergone liposuction and a Brazilian butt lift—surgeries that Carlos claims he never approved.
Dr. Victor Emanuel Rosales Galindo, Paloma’s stepfather and a licensed plastic surgeon, is at the center of the controversy. Reports indicate that he may have performed these surgeries with his wife’s involvement, despite her lack of medical training. Following the outcry, he has been suspended from the Mexican Council of Plastic Aesthetic and Reconstructive Surgery, and both he and Paloma’s mother are now under investigation for potential malpractice and negligence.
Local prosecutors have stated that the cause of death was initially recorded as a respiratory illness, with a death certificate citing cerebral edema and hypoxic encephalopathy. However, concerns have emerged regarding the authenticity of medical documents related to Paloma’s treatment, including a COVID-19 test certificate that may have been forged. The situation has raised questions about possible cover-ups, especially considering Dr. Galindo’s family connections within the local judicial system.
As the investigation unfolds, an autopsy has been ordered to determine the exact cause of death. Experts suggest that complications from the surgeries could have contributed to her demise, emphasizing the risks associated with performing such procedures on a minor. Dr. Nita Rutherford, a forensic expert, highlighted the potential dangers involved in general anesthesia and the unique medical considerations required for someone still in their developmental stages.
The public outcry surrounding Paloma’s death has prompted calls for legislative changes regarding cosmetic surgery for minors in Mexico. Prominent figures, including local government officials, have expressed their commitment to ensuring justice for Paloma and preventing similar tragedies in the future. Meanwhile, Carlos has become a vocal advocate for change, organizing community marches and campaigns to raise awareness about the risks of early cosmetic surgery and the need to protect young girls from exploitation.
As the investigation continues, the case remains a poignant reminder of the complexities surrounding cosmetic procedures, parental consent, and the ethical responsibilities of medical professionals.
